January 25, 2014

Exploding Nuclear Reactors vs Nuclear Weapons

“Aliens’ and your favorite mass media had it wrong. Nuclear Reactors do not explode like Nuclear Weapons for some very good, science based reasons. While still a major concern for a whole host of environmental and long term waste disposal reasons Nuclear Reactors are not really that high on a Terrorists targeting matrix. The attached article by a Penn State student simplifies the argument as much as possible. It is a quick read but essentially it is an Apples and Oranges argument.

Why a Nuclear Reactor Cannot Explode like an Atom Bomb

Jason Denhollander / http://www.personal.psu.edu/jdd5053/blogs/the_den/technical-description.html


Reactors and Atom Bombs
A nuclear reactor is a power plant, that uses nuclear fission to eventually generate electricity.
An atom bomb also uses nuclear fission to generate energy causing an explosion. However, due to
fundamental differences between the two a nuclear reactor cannot explode like an atom bomb. To
understand these differences, it is first important to understand the concept of nuclear fission and
criticality.


Background
Fission
Nuclear fission results when a neutron collides with an atom, causing it to become unstable and
split. Once the atom splits, neutrons are released, along with energy and radiation, this is shown below
in figure 1. In a reactor, the energy released is used to heat water. Eventually once the temperature of
the water is high enough, the water will change to steam. The steam is then forced through a turbine,
which creates electricity. Depending on the speed of the neutrons, a fission can be either a fast fission
or a thermal fission. Thermal fissions pertain to slower moving neutrons.
Figure 1. Fission Reaction
The concept of fission is the heart of the nuclear industry. In a reactor millions of fission
reactions are needed to generate the energy required to heat the water. Causing fissions over and over
again would not be an effective way to do this, instead a chain reaction is used. A fission chain
reaction is a fission reaction that sustains itself. When a neutron collides with an atom, more neutrons
are released. If there is an abundance of atoms, and the neutrons are contained, the neutrons that are
released from the first reaction, will cause more atoms to fission releasing more energy and more
neutrons. The number of neutrons present after each fission is the criticality of the reactor and is
denoted by the multiplication factor k.
The Multiplication Factor and the Six-Factor Formula
The multiplication factor, k, is simply the number of neutrons produced per fission, divided by he number of neutrons lost per fission. The six-factor formula is composed of six factors that when
multiplied together equal k, k = η f ε p PTNL PFNL . Each term represents a different way a neutron can be
lost or gained.
• η - Production Factor. The production factor compares the number of neutrons produced to the
number of neutrons being absorbed. It is dependent on the type of fuel being used.
• f - Thermal Utilization Factor. The thermal utilization factor compares the amount of neutrons
being absorbed by the fuel to the amount of neutrons being absorbed everywhere else.
• ε - Fast Fission Factor. The fast fission factor compares the total amount of fissions to the
amount of thermal fissions.
• p - Resonance Escape Probability. The resonance escape probability is the probability that a
neutron survives the resonances as it slows down from a fast neutron to a thermal neutron.
• PTNL - Thermal Non-leakage Probability. The thermal non-leakage probability is the probability
that a thermal neutron will not leak outside of the core.
• PFNL - Fast Non-leakage Probability. The fast non-leakage probability is the probability that a
fast neutron will not leak outside of the core.
Figure 2. The neutron life cycle
Figure 2 shows the neutron life cycle, which is simply the terms of the six-factor formula. Once
the multiplication factor is determined, the criticality of the reactor can be found.
• k > 1 --> supercritical, more neutrons are being produced than lost.
• k = 1 --> critical, the same amount of neutrons are being produced as lost.
• k < 1 --> subcritical, more neutrons are being lost than produced.
The criticality of a reactor is a crucial design element. A subcritical reactor is useless since it
will be impossible to start a fission chain reaction. While a critical reactor is the most desirable,
reactors are normally designed to be supercritical, and then through the use of moderators, are scaled
back to critical. Now that fission and criticality are understood, it is easy to see the differences between
an atomic bomb and a nuclear reactor.he Differences
There are two main fundamental differences between the design of an atomic bomb, and the
design of a nuclear reactor. One difference is the way the fission reactions are controlled and the
second difference stems from the enrichment of the fuel.


Control of Nuclear Fission
One main difference between the two is that the fission events in a reactor are monitored and
controlled closely. An atom bomb is an uncontrolled fission chain reaction, that releases exorbitant
amounts of energy quickly. The design of a nuclear reactor includes control rods. The control rods are
placed in the core to control the fission reaction. Control rods do this by absorbing neutrons, which
decreases the multiplication factor. The more control rods in the core, the lower the criticality, thus
there will be less neutrons available for fission. An atom bomb is designed to maintain all the neutrons
produced, making it always supercritical.


Enrichment
The second difference between the two is the enrichment of the fuel. Natural uranium, the
uranium found in the earth, cannot be used as a fuel because it is not reactive enough to cause a chain
reaction. This is because natural uranium is composed almost entirely of U
238, which is a relatively
stable element. By enriching it with U235, the uranium becomes more reactive, which increases the
production factor. While both fuel for a reactor and fuel for an atomic bomb are enriched, a reactor's
fuel is only enriched around 4 to 5 percent. Whereas an atomic bomb is enriched to about 90 percent.
This makes the multiplication factor much larger in a bomb than a reactor, which signifies a greater
number of available neutrons. The fuel used in a reactor is not capable of causing an explosion.


Explosions
While a nuclear reactor can never explode like an atomic bomb, an explosion can still occur.
All power plants are a potential site for an explosion, because the fuel used, whether it is coal, uranium,
or natural gas, needs to be energy dense. At coal plants, sparks can set coal dust on fire causing an
explosion. Gas leaks can cause explosions at natural gas plants. Typically at a nuclear reactor, the type
of explosion seen would be a steam explosion. A steam explosion could only occur if the reactor
suffered a meltdown. A meltdown means that due to lack of coolant, or too much fission, the core
becomes so hot that it melts. Due to the intense heat produced, water is turned to steam. Also, the fuel
rods melt, turning them into a liquid. This allows the metal to react with the steam, causing an
explosion.


The destruction at Chernobyl was caused by a steam explosion. Since the turbine feed valves
were closed, the steam in the core had nowhere to go. Then, the pressure in the core did not increase,
causing even more steam to be created. When the reactor core began to meltdown, liquid metal
touched the steam, causing an explosion. The explosion caused the roof of the core to lift off, exposing
the core to air. The air reacted with the graphite moderator in the core, resulting in the production of
carbon monoxide. Since carbon monoxide is flammable, it caught fire due to the extreme heat in the
core. The fire burned for days.

Conclusion
Even during the worst accident in the history of nuclear reactors, an explosion like an
atomic bomb did not occur. This is because the fuel and design of a nuclear reactor do not allow the
fission reaction to become uncontrolled making it impossible for an explosion like an atomic bomb to
occur.

 

Technical Description - The Den

January 15, 2014

X-Files' star Gillian Anderson writing sci-fi book series

"'X-Files' star Gillian Anderson writing sci-fi book series Crave: The gadget blog by Bonnie Burton  /  22min  //  keep unread  //  hide  //  preview

+TAG Actress Gillian Anderson, best known for her role as FBI Agent Dana Scully -- Agent Fox Mulder's skeptical partner -- in hit sci-fi series 'The X-Files,' is now writing a sci-fi book series called 'EarthEnd Saga' with co-writer Jeff Rovin, who is best known for 'Tom Clancy's Op-Center' book series.

The first book in the saga, 'A Vision of Fire,' tells the story of a child psychiatrist, Caitlin O'Hara, who treats children who have suffered trauma due to war and natural disasters. O'Hara's world changes forever when she begins to help one troubled young girl.

'Over the course of spending time and helping her and investigating the origins of the girl's trauma, Caitlin begins to realize that the girl's behavior is tied to much greater forces in the universe, and as the story unfolds, she must prevent destruction on a grand scale,' Anderson told Entertainment Weekly.

Related stories

Sorry Neil Gaiman fans, he's taking a Twitter break Judge rebuffs Apple attempt to block e-books monitor ... [Read more]

Related Links: Hilarious SFFworthy makes Upworthy headlines geektastic The 'Star Wars Episode VII' storyline we'll never see Amazon: 5 bold predictions for 2014 Cheers to the aliens: Sci-Fi Hotel, Giger Bar coming to US? Amazon Studios to begin shooting original series in 4K"

All:

(Via Louisville's Independent Media / LNOradio.com.)

January 13, 2014

AK-47 Vs. M-16 - Action Figure Therapy